23 February 2009

Winston Chuchill made the observation that democracy was the worst form of government, save all the rest.  Actually he was referring to the government of a republic, not pure democracy.  We should all think about that as different constituencies vie for inceased power.

We should also think about the constitutionally developed form of republic we have, in light of the natural tendency of man to seek continually increased power for himself - and his constituency, whatever that might be.  Our Constitution is rather unique, having been hammered out through difficult and contentious compromise, something (compromise) all hate specifically because none get all that they want - to the detriment of others.  Its principle strength is separation of power.

In our republic the  executive department is both nationally elected and appointed: the president is elected by the people and appoints those that will assist him in governing the country.  Actually that is not entirely the case; the president is, at least theoretically, elected by the representatives of the people who are elected directly by the people.  This division is important in that is protects us from the tyranny of a majority.  Think about that for a minute.

Our national legislature is bicammeral, that is there are two parts.  One (House of Representatives)  is elected by the people, regionally, that is, through direct vote within each congressional district - as close to democracy as is practical.  The other (Senate) was (constitutionally) elected by the State Legislatures - which were separated from the national government through the means of federalism; states possess rights to everything not specifically assigned to the national government (at least prior to the usurpsion of interstate commerce).  Now senators are elected by direct vote of all citizens of each state.

We should keep in mind the reason for division of powers within the Constitution, based on a knowledge and understanding of self interest.  The House of Reprensentatives was designed to be direct representatives of the people - their constituents.  The Senate, with longer tenure, was designed to provide state representation within a federalist environment of separation of powers.  The intent was the broadest possible division of power within representation of the people's interests throughout the republic.

One man one vote, similar to  voter selection of senators, represents a steady movement toward dangerous populism and centralized government  a la France.  We must beware of what we wish for.  The logical extension of democratization of the republic is, first, rule of cities, second, anarchy.  The founders considered this very carefully, and understoo the possible pitfalls; we should do the same.  Tampering with their formula is frought with untintended circumstances. 

Beware.